By OP, I was referring to your post, not the 1st post - I could have been clearer about that. Your implication was quite clear whether you want to admit it now or not. Whether you like the term "extrapolate" or not doesn't really matter to me - the term fits perfectly what you were trying to do. There are 3 families around 50 near you so the 80/20 rule is in question?? Of course you "suggested" it - it is there in black and white. You simply chose to use a rhetorical question to make your "suggestion" (posted below).
so what are the odds that given an 80/20 split we would have had three families in our neighborhood age 50-51?
The 3 families around 50 in your neighborhood do not shed any light on where we stand with the 80/20 rule. There can be no "further reasoning" with such a small sample size as it isn't and can't be representative of The Villages as a whole. There are no families around 50 on my street. There are 57,000 homes in The Villages. Please post some real, statistically significant numbers instead of using a term like "propaganda" and a rhetorical question, as you did in your post. In your original post, you also accused the Government of essentially not doing their job of rules compliance (posted below).
However I do care when government intentionally blurs the lines of rules and regulation policies and compliance's or allows them to lapse because the community suffers.
Back it up with evidence. Have a nice day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
Seriously I did not suggest , or extrapolate, anything. It was an observation, a question looking for further reasoning.
You however have taken it upon yourself to imply and define it to your liking. And because you repeated this commentary twice you seem to have a bee under your bonnet But hey, if it rocks your world, knock yourself out
P. S. I was not the OP on this thread.
|