OK, so I was trained as a scientist so I will respond. Typically, if the results cannot be reproduced by others then there is a significant doubt. Also, without peer review, any results are suspect. I am not saying that new phenomenon cannot be discovered. It is just that the probability is remote without corroboration. As I stated before, there is a difference between faith and fact. Mediums fall into the category of faith. Scientists deal with facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoGeo
I would like to talk to a bunch of people who have been to a medium and see what they think. I watch that tv show that is on now.....can't think of the name of it.....Tyler is the guy's name and he reads famous Hollywood people. They act like there is no way he could have known the things he comes up with because they said it things that have never been published or they have never talked about to anyone. But if you haven't gone through it yourself, how you to say for sure if it is real or not. There are a lot of things we don't understand even though we have scientists, so maybe this is one of those things that could be real. And then again even if it is real there are always people who will pretend to be a medium just to get money. How many of you have been to a medium?
|