Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Of course you were rude. And it was obviously deliberate and unjustified.
My original post was not in support of any group; it was in support of the First Amendment of the Constitution. As the Supreme Court has pointed out, hate speech is protected by the Constitution. That doesn't mean that I approve of it, nor does the Supreme Court.
You say that Rubicon and I discuss "identity politics." The use of quotation marks means the use of those exact words. First off, I don't know Rubicon, and we do not communicate privately about our postings. Secondly, I defy you to find any post of mine, anywhere, where I use the words "Identity Politics."
Most of the rest of your post has nothing to do with me or the original post regarding protecting the First Amendment, so I won't bother to address it.
.
.
Carl in Tampa
.
.
.
|
Carl:
my aplogy. This poster draws some sort of connection because I responded to one of your post by copying(quote button) and moved mistakenly to make a non-existent personal connection to you and me.
I apply the quote only for the purpose(s) of continuity to a specific train of thought
As to the subject matter of identity politic it is widely discussed across America by both conservatives and liberals.
Personal Best Regards: