Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
This study has no relationship to the discussion. This study is about transactions between individuals who live in the same state.
It is a federal violation for individual sales where one person is a resident of a state other than where the transaction occurs.
The only way such transactions can occur is by using a "middleman" in both states who has a Federal Firearms License. The FFL holder must do a background check.
Again, what state law would you "tighten" to control an activity that is already a violation of federal law?
Carl in Tampa
.
|
hmmmm......firearms are not limited to handguns
Other posts have suggested tightening or closing the loophole allowing sales of firearms without background checks at gun shows, private sales....try reading each post and don't jump all over the one thing that you happen to disagree with. Keep the laws as they are: we will have more and more gun related deaths. Change the laws to make them more effective, fewer gun deaths. It looks obvious which alternative you want.....