View Single Post
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:49 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Not harsh at all or even close.

I do not attack him Rubicon because he disagrees with me....not at all.....fact is would welcome some substantive discussion from him but it never happens.

I have allowed him much supporting evidence.

I have allowed and showed him to plagerize TWICE that I can recall.

I have allowed and showed him linking to a Russian fake news site.

I have read and as can you, is almost daily attacks on whatever has made him angry that day.

I oppose Donald Trump, and have supplied volumes of evidence of his upbringing and hate before he was nominated or elected. I attach links showing how mean spirited this person is since he was elected.

BUT....I never criticize people in groups...although I will admit that I have begun to lump "Trump Supporters" because of the total complete echoing of non supportive positions because he tweeted about some issue.

Rubicon lumps people into groups....blacks, "progressives" (put in quotes because he has never defined that. He simply makes a general condemnation of millions of fellow americans, not on policy, not on issue, but PERSONALLY. He characterizes fellow americans a number of ways.......fellow americans, and he does this because they are whatever label he is working with on that day.

I, Coldnomore and others have criticized this President, shared links to make our point...shared his quotes to show he said what we heard him say, and we are then told we have "Trump derangement Syndrome, as if his hate for other Americans no brainwashed was not a serious syndrome in itself.

I get criticized much for supplying too much
information......RUBICON just says things about other people he does not know and makes such terrible and untrue accusations, it is scary.

Not harsh at all. If he believes that plagarism, and we are speaking word for word and passing it off as his own, is not stealing, then yes, I question his christian values. If condemning others on a public forum because they do not agree with your idol is not being judgemental and cruel then he better check his good book that he likes to share with all of us, to make himself look like a good man.

No, not too harsh...he has been challenged and re challenged on ISSUES AND SUBSTANCE, and ignores that and attacks. Yes, it has become personal, because when he speaks of facts and supplies fiction and never is able to document anything he says, and while he will preach to other posters about substance and never speak to substance, that makes him a deceiver.
My friend you need to go back and read what you just wrote . Then you need to ponder that you and the other poster you reference, whose comments were not too harsh, have repeatedly shown yourselves to be postmoderist contrarians with circular thinking and to try to engage in civil discourse with either of you is a waste of time, keyboarding and electricity.

I do not have to prove any of what i just said because post after post by both of you supports my argument

Personal Best Regards: