|
10-09-2017, 05:34 PM
|
|
n/a
|
|
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
It seems to me the real issue is education. When the Constitution was written, the nation was in danger of being invaded by England, and we had no standing army. Therefore the FIRST part of the Second Amendment clearly states "In order to form a well regulated militia"...citizens could arm themselves to defend the nation against invasion. So, if you are a member of a "well regulated" militia you have the right to own a gun. Otherwise, not so much.
|
Pure crap -- you liar! !
Do you see the word "form" it the 2nd Amendment.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. AND -- "well regulated" means KEEP REGULAR -- in other words keep the Army honest, as sufferers in POLICE STATES would appreciate.
Sorry, but this is a piece of sh*t post from a Femo-Fascist-educated cool-aid drinker.
And there's nothing ambiguous about the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.... adding to your first impression as a POS.
|