Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has asked the White House to provide more information about whether staffers are adhering to the Presidential Records Act. (The White House refused.)
This comes after revelations that top White House aides — including first daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner — have been using personal email to conduct official business. SHADES OF HILLARY, RIGHT?
The Presidential Records Act might have something to say about this practice. Its purpose, born out of the wreckage of Watergate, was to protect us not only from official misconduct, but from ourselves. It was meant to warn presidents that they may not brush their foibles, or crimes, under the Oval Office rug. It was to preserve, indefinitely, that which we all might wish to forget.
|
The heading of your topic is in the form of a question.
To that I would respond that there is no question the Clintons resisted production of documents, destroyed evidence.
To that I respond that there is no question the Obama Administration refused to cooperate with the scandals of Fast & Furious, Benghazi, IRS , et al
To that I would respond that the Obama Administration refused to respond to the clandestine and illegal meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on an airport tarmac.
To that I respond everyone talked up the Trump dossier but no one seems to want to explain who paid for it nor to produce it.
I'm getting tired too many more progressive did not respond events like Debbie Schultz and hr Pakistani pals
Personal Best Regards: