Quote:
Originally Posted by jswintberg
I heard the same thing that the 3/4, folded up at the bottom screens are part of a test related to keeping the courts dryer. Really??? How long is this test supposed to last? How are the test results measured? If this is a test, why not just conduct the test on tennis courts. Sounds like a crock. I don't see how the shorter windscreen installation has anything to do with saving money. There has to be a better reason why some courts have the full length screens as opposed to the folded up at the bottom screens. The wind comes whistling through the bottom of the folded up screens like a wind tunnel. This is just another court conundrum like the short fences without windscreens between the tennis courts and PB courts at Bradenton and Manatee, where, most always there is an unnecessary cross breeze from the tennis courts.
|
Finely somebody beside Kansasr gets it. I expect the same standards and they are not being ment. IMO the person that thought this up should be fired wasting money and time.. That usually problem when you have developers neptunium in place. If they want to save ammenties money stop planting flowers in roundabout every Three months creating worker and driving hazards and saving hundreds of thousands.