Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
Although you won’t get many well thought out answers on this forum your question is legitimate. The bill effectively takes money away from the “healthcare system” so one of two things must happen; total healthcare delivery will decrease or cost will be redistributed elsewhere. I’m fairly sure most of the posters on this forum have their healthcare covered primarily by taxpayers or future taxpayers and argue it is their just due. The problem is still cost and our elected leadership dares not take it on for fair of losing election contributions and support.
|
One can infer from your opening declaration you make that your position on this matter that yours is the only well thought out response and hence the only correct answer
I posted earlier and let me repeat the mandate is a tax penalty, primarily on the poor and those without employment and that fact was adjudicated by the Supreme Court.
As an example more than 34,000 families in Maine paid $15 million to the government for the high privilege of not buying Obamacare. Repeal would essentially be a tax relief for low income families
By the way CBO has a lousy record of prediction because Obamacare enrollment is 60% below its estimate and one indicator that Obamacare is in need of reform.
Actually Obama and Company intentionally design the ACA to fail so they could come back with a single payer plan ( another thread for another time). Essentially killing the individual mandate can serve the cause for both tax and healthcare reform
I wish politicians from both parties would stop the fear-mongering politicking. And, let's give get the rich a rest. The rich will always be rich and noting Washington does is going to change that. Further getting the rich doesn't put a penny more in your pocket.
Personal Best Regards: