Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
Technically I think it's called a bump stock. To me if walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck. The other obvious answer is to limit magazines to a reasonable number, let's say around 10. If he hd to pull the trigger for every shot and change clips after 10 shots I feel sure even gun enthusiasts would agree the death and wound toll would have been dramatically less because people would have time to run. Your question on non citizens got me thinking. I'm certain everything I written contains some errors. I also am certain if you apply that standard to Fox news your spend the rest of your life trying to count their misstatements.
|
Regulating bump stocks to me is a no-brainer. Fully automatic weapons are highly regulated. They are very difficult and expensive to obtain. A bump stock makes a semi-automatic firearm perform as if it is fully automatic.
But I don't think that limiting the capacity of a magazine will slow down anyone very much. I can change magazines in about two seconds, maybe less.
I would be Ok with limiting the capacity of magazines as long as I can be guaranteed that no bad guys will have more rounds than I have.