Quote:
Originally Posted by Madelaine Amee
I will reverse your questions on you :
What do we do with people who are absolutely unable to take care of themselves? They had work houses in England back in the 1800s. Germany had gas chambers. The third world countries manage to leave their indigents dying in the road ............ Seriously, if you make a statement like yours you HAVE to have an acceptable answer.
This country of ours is a GREAT country built on Christian principles. We built this country on the backs of people who were expendable in their own countries. There is sufficient money in this country to take care of people who are truly in need. Unfortunately many of the richest people in this country would rather fund political parties than put their money to good use helping those less fortunate.
In my opinion, which is worth probably nothing, it comes down to lack of care for our fellow man who is less fortunate. Thank goodness for the Salvation Army and other such groups that do their Christian best to take care of people in need.
|
Why is it when a legitimate question is raised about being responsible, people go to some extreme negative which is far outside of any human dignity today. The question is: "Who is responsible for your Life?" This nation was built on people that did not ask for a hand out. Who understood you get what you work for and no one owes you anything. Now after saying that we would not be much of a Christian based nation if we ignored those that need help, and we do not. People get Health Care when they need it, FREE. At least for them, but the rest of us pay that bill in one way or another. The questions I propose set the foundation to building a plan to fix the problem. Who is responsible for your life and how do we implement a system that drives that point, while providing a necessary service to the community?