[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by Bonnevie

I respectfully disagree that marching and protesting are a waste of time. an example of positive change from such actions:

On April 22,1970, 20 million Americans took to the streets, parks, and auditoriums to demonstrate for a healthy, sustainable environment in massive coast-to-coast rallies. Thousands of colleges and universities organized protests against the deterioration of the environment. Groups that had been fighting against oil spills, polluting factories and power plants, raw sewage, toxic dumps, pesticides, freeways, the loss of wilderness, and the extinction of wildlife suddenly realized they shared common values.

Earth Day 1970 achieved a rare political alignment, enlisting support from Republicans and Democrats, rich and poor, city slickers and farmers, tycoons and labor leaders. By the end of that year, the first Earth Day had led to the creation of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the passage of the Clean Air, Clean Water, and Endangered Species Acts. “It was a gamble,” Gaylord (wisconsin senator) recalled, “but it worked.”

I believe walks,etc. let people know there are other people who feel as they do and it lessens discouragement with the status quo. The early civil rights marches where marchers had dogs attack them and water cannons, brought an awareness to many who didn't experience that in their lives.


and I do not believe the Parkland students are pawns of anyone. They might be getting help from teachers and adults, but they are the ones leading this, they are intelligent, articulate victims of a mass shooting who want to bring about change.

the problem with living in a "bubble" is that it keeps ideas and different opinions out.

My opinion is different than yours. I may live here but I stick my head frequently outside the bubble. I talk frequently with a line producer at MSNBC. At least once a week. I read the following;

New York Times
The Washington Post
The Guardian
Vox
APWire
I watch
Fox News
MSNBC
CNN
ALL THREE of them.

I try to avoid any publication that is borderline. Whether it be Breitbart or Mother Jones etc.

I may live here but I am up to date and I try to see both sides. I consider myself a moderate. (That is a person that no one agrees with.)