Quote:
Originally Posted by Fraugoofy
I think if we were trying to keep "the bad guys out" this is a start.
However, every shooter has been an inside job, in other words the shooters have been students. Typically students have more free access than visitors, who are required to enter through the front door and sign in and get a badge.
Each of the shooter students were already inside the building, ready and armed. This mean logically each and every day all incoming people would have to pass through one metal dector entrance. This will add time to a normal student day. Time well spent I might add.
I currently work in a juvenile detention center where I have students in my classroom that commit violent crimes...they truly think differently than we do.
Sent from my SM-N920R4 using Tapatalk
|
Well, you might think so, but you would be wrong. Let's look at some examples.
Columbine (Colorado) - The shooters were students, but they didn't show up at school until lunch time. A single point of entry with metal detectors and armed guards should have stopped them.
Sandy Hook (Connecticut) -
Former student. The shooter had attended the school six years prior, but had since attended other schools, and was being home schooled when he did this shooting. At the school he was confronted by a locked door, but shot his way through an adjacent glass pane. No armed guards to stop him.
Parkland (Florida) -
Former student, showed up at end of school day. Went in as others were about to come out. Armed police officer on scene failed to do his duty.
Access control means everyone from the Principal to the janitor, and
all of the students. With access control and metal detectors there wouldn't be students "already inside the building, ready and armed."