Quote:
Originally Posted by Stdole
Many of you posting has forgot who is the VICTIM is in this case. It is not the dead man it is the man who stopped the threat on his life. That is what the law is telling you here and part of the reason he was not and will not be charged. If a person breaks into your home and you kill them to save your life, the dead man would be called the culprit . Don't make this case complicated... The man on the ground felt his life was in danger... The law does not state your accused has to be armed with a gun or a hammer or a rock etc... I wil make an educated guess that posters here that are opposed to concealed carry or 2nd Amend. Will have the
Victim as wrong. Just remember in these crimes who is/was the VICTIM.
|
I believe the first victim in all of this was the woman sitting in the car that the man accosted. I don't believe the "first aggressor" is the victim. So, was the guy who shoved him protecting his partner? Who was standing his ground first?
This guy will probably get away with murdering another person because he got knocked over.
Something's wrong with the law if this person is not charged. I agree with BTK.