
09-25-2018, 10:13 AM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man
I believe that ownership is used. 80% of the homes must be owned by at least one person over 55. Who lives in the house does not matter. It's been a while since I read through the Housing for Older Persons Act, but that is my memory of it.
I never understood why some of my neighbors (everyone in TV is my neighbor) are so upset by this. OK. None of us knew the details of the 55+ restriction when we came here. Nor did we even think to look into it. Most or all of us thought that we would see only people in their late 50's and up. In other words, we thought that 55+ meant ONLY 55+. But, surprise, that is not what it means. I for one shrug my shoulders and consider it another of a million details in life that has not had a negative affect on me.
As far as the crimes committed by the so called "loser" children of residents, seems to me that most of them are drug possession and DWI. No different than many of the 55+ arrests.
|
Excellent sane post. Mark me as your fan. Gracie.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
|