
02-06-2019, 09:02 AM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,784 Times in 2,004 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chellybean
Now the Fact.
A footprint of a home is considered the full footprint of the house that includes the eve's.
Second the complaint driven enforcement is Selective enforcement and some can consider it unjust and not the law and can go as far as it being discrimination. ???
Third if it is anonymous the people are cowards to be exposed as unhappy trolls.??? The ones that do use there names to file a complaint puts the neighbors at opposition against each other and Community Standards Policy is to give out the complainant name. Nobody gives out anyone's name.This way Community Standard can control the complaint trolls from attacking neighborhoods.???
Usually the trolls are people that have been targeted by other trolls. Usually the people who report people who are not in compliance have reason to do so. Many of us enjoy this place without a lot of schlocky ornamentation.
The bottom line is it is a poor system designed By the developer to put neighbors and villagers in opposition at each other and indeed is selective enforcement.It looks to me that it is a good way to get the job done without extra expense. A little here, a little there and someone has to pay for it.
However the Community Standards holds the cards in intimidation and penalties and fines.
Don't fold so easy just because Community Standards say its wrong. Do your research and stop the Selective enforcement by Community Standards.
I do agree some things need to be enforced when neighbors get out of control with the Yard Art.
Also Community Standards Attorney Can Not make opinions in how to interpret the law or some Standards Language Only a Judge can form a opinion
|
My money is on the fact that this has all been legally researched and will stand the test.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
|