How marvelously cavalier of you. I take exception with your representation that the subscribers to this forum, regardless of political persuasion, need to be "implored" to think for themselves as you suggest. It makes them sound incapable of understanding the King's English. It at least can be viewed as mildly condescending don't you think.

To the contrary, I have found everyone, including those of opposing views, to be articulate, thoughtful, and intelligent. They state their positions and convictions with clarity. I enjoy interacting with them, respect them and would never ignore them because they view the world from a different perspective. Some have even swayed my own pot stirring views. I would never dismiss them, or "ignore" them as you suggest because they made a "vitriolic" post supporting their belief. I sincerely appreciate the exchange of views inconsistent with my own. Even yours. I am a big fan of your economic posts in both forums, for the most part. I respect and give great deference to your professional expertise.

You said, "ignore some of the vitriol being purposely circulated by partisans". Are you suggesting we only read posts on your approved list? Who will you designate as the "vitriol" police so that we can ignore it? Who will determine what is "vitriol" and what is not?

I believe it is a superior attitude that would suggest that posters in this forum need to be "implored" and better informed to cast our vote. We are perfectly capable of separating 'vitriol' from fact and drawing our own conclusions without the suggestion we are incapable of making the distinction.


Have a great day in the Villages.