Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomer
An analytical post built on specifics and showing the poster's ability to apply critical thinking skills should not be interpreted as negative and should never insight name-calling and predictable, platitudinous, pseudo-sympathetic comments from other posters.
Thinkers gonna think for themselves. Too bad that bothers some and sends them down their well-worn path of name-calling and lame implications about someone's life and happiness. Ridiculous.
Why not come back with a well thought out opposing opinion of the actual situation, complete with backup. But that is not likely to happen. It is so much easier for some to dismiss and try to cover up anything that might be leading to discomfort if acknowledgment of a different way of thinking is getting too close.
But (sigh) the wagons are circling, as usual. The thought police are on patrol. Posts are being weaponized with boring and boorish clichéd comments to try to make those with differing opinions go away. The "Us vs. Them" posters are out and in formation.
The inability (or refusal) to try to understand shades of gray in levels of varying opinions ends up with the need to dismiss and mock in order to not have to tax one's own thinking. Turning the tone of a debate toxic comes so much easier than a well thought out rebuttal -- so there you have it. Textbook stuff on how not to debate.
And soon, the thread will close. (sigh)
|
This is one of the best posts Ive read that speaks volumes about where most posts end up...If u read post 116 ,117, 118 the comments make me want to say things that surely the moderator would not approve of. Its a shame opinions/views on the subject at hand, cant be taken with value and the name calling/smudge remarks could be refrained from.