I am not concerned about the very specific complaints but rather (1) Does it meet the "Intent" of the rules on buildings in the villages and (2) if not how did it slip by the Review Controls and (3) what impact will this have on future buildings? These should be under study and where appropriate the restrictions better defined and better enforced. In Stuart Florida a builder actually built a complex of multiple condo's, rented some and sold some. Long after they were built and rented and sold a Judge stepped in and ruled they were not in compliance with approval requirements and ruled they must be torn down and they were. That is what is needed if rules are ignored and blatantly violated.
