Quote:
Originally Posted by cologal
Bucco.... I can't agree with you at all. Using his middle name, and in the case you are referring to, using it as his first name has only one point. Perhaps I should have said using it was HATE SPEECH and if you check the later posts I did say perhaps I was to strong.
I posted that poster because it is an example of HATE SPEECH in the W's..it not for point by point detail. I cannot connect the dots between Obama and Ayers..its just not there in the way you want it to be. In the W's Ayers was a Radical....not a Domestic Terrorist...the Terrorist now has a specific meaning especially since 9/11. He became a respected university professor and then he met Obama. When Obama sat on the board with Ayers did Ayers bomb anything? How about now...what has he bombed lately?
And now then go further down the road....
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpoi..._after_mic.php
This is getting totally ridiculous.....
I won't vote for McCain because:
- He voted against equal pay for women
- He voted against up armour for the troops
- He try to derail the New GI bill and skipped the vote
- My taxes will be higher under McCain
- I used to respect him but now he has lost all that (lying)
Given all that how in the world do I pull the lever for him? |
You really have me confused Cologal....
1. I do not seen anywhere in this thread "his" middle name at all, thus not sure why you brought it up. Plus, you know it IS HIS MIDDLE NAME..he will have to use it sometime. If his folks didnt cry hate and racist everytime his middle name is mentioned perhaps it would not be such a big deal !!
2. You are missing the Ayers connection totally. Nobody says he is a terrorist today, and nobody says he hasnt done some good things. HOWEVER, AS OF THIS MINUTE..he still maintains he did the right thing in killing people and bombing and says he did no wrong. THAT is the issue Cologal. I suppose if any person who bombs and kills does good work but does not repent and still feels that their killing was justified, it would be ok with you !!
3. You really have been reading Huffington and such places when you list those 5 things you did. To bring up his vote on the armor or the GI bill would be the same as me bringing up all the votes that Sen Obama did not cast in Chicago. You have got to know the real reason on both those issues I would hope !
4. If you are calling Sen McCain a liar because of the Ayers issue, you are slandering him for no reason. No lies have been told...please, but I know you wont do the googling I suggested.
5. But by far the most erronious error on your list of 5 things you list about Sen McCain that is the most unfounded and almost the exacxt opposite of reality is your statement on taxes. You have not seen taxes until you see what you will pay under Sen Obama...and I ask you to save this not until he is in office, if elected, for a bit and bring it out and read it..I can almost guarantee it.