View Single Post
 
Old 08-01-2019, 12:39 PM
OrangeBlossomBaby OrangeBlossomBaby is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,498
Thanks: 6,855
Thanked 9,455 Times in 3,086 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marathon Man View Post
Delivering the rec news to 1/4 of the people would cost more than 1/4 of the current cost.
Nitpicking and totally obfuscating the point.

The point, is that there will be "a savings" to subscription-only. Whatever that savings is, whether $50 or $50,000 or $350,000 - can be used on other things.

Currently they cannot be used on other things, because they're busy being used on waste (meaning - the savings portion of the expense - is being used on printing and distributing something to people who don't actually want it).