Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdNoMore
As asked previously...then what?
Keeping in mind that these people are simply reporting 'POTENTIAL' deed violations and are not the ones making the final determination...why exactly do you want to know who they are?
As to the asinine suggestion that in these, non-criminal cases, one "has the right to confront their accuser," reread the above paragraph...of whom does the actual "accusing."
It's patently obvious, that the ONLY reason to want to identify those turning in potential violations, is to, in some way... personally harass/bully those individuals.
Deplorable. 
|
This is exactly why I don't think the property owner should have access to the complainer's personally identifying information.
But Community Standards absolutely should have that information, to protect themselves, and to ensure there's some measure of accountability. If this turns out to a total nut-job, and 80% of those reports are fake and made up, then they need to be able to tell the nut-job to cease and desist. They can't do that, if they don't know who it is.