Instead of so many key strokes being wasted on trying to determine which negative is best defined what what credible or other wise person....let's only compare the issues of substance.
Spending time defending which entertainer is more or less valid, vulgar, honest or what ever is a waste of time.

How about a real factual discussion of who the candidates really are? Are not?
Issues that matter when they get elected?
Which one do you want standing atop the rubble after the next terrorist attack in America?

Some one please remind me the last time issues were intelligently discussed without getting into a media or partisan induced urinating contest??

If y'all were not allowed to talk about Bush or Palin you wouldn't have much to say!! IMHO

BTK