Quote:
Originally Posted by TexaninVA
Describing Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi as an “austere religious scholar” is not related to so-called fake news or bias etc.
Rather, it’s WaPo’s unwillingness to accurately describe who he was.
He was the epitome … literally … of a Radical Is*lamic Terrorist, which is a largely forbidden term.
He was the Caliph (i.e combination of a Pope & King) who was the head guy for ISIS (Is*lamic State of Iraq and Syria). Hence, the WaPo simply chose to deliberately obfuscate who he was.
Great job by the US military and intel community by the way. I especially liked the “hero dog.” That snarling dog’s face was the last thing the Baghdadi saw on this earth and likely is what prompted him to hit the detonator.
|
Interesting......
Here we have a story that is 100% accurate, but with. A very questionable headline.
Last night and this morning, regarding a patriotic war hero testifying before congress today, on one of the most watched networks, they are questioning his patriotism, suggesting he may be a double agent, etc, and the WH is in full character assisination mode. So, in this case, NO FACTS, just attack for some reason.
I will take the source with facts and truth.