Quote:
Originally Posted by TexaninVA
Would be best not to inject politics into this discussion and instead stick to the topic of the thread
|
Topic is news coverage and I agree with you.
I am comparing critiquing a headline and ignoring the accuracy of the story...
To
A manufactured story with no facts with much twisted information.
Fair, actually not fair.....broadcasting on a news network things that are not true simply to go after the character of a hero vet serving his country and broadcasting as if true.....well, THAT serves as a great example of cheap and sham journalism, from a source oft quoted on this very forum.
My reference to the WH seems fair, as a number of folks have done so already, and much of what is coming from there, if not all began on that same network.
NOT political unless you see it somewhere.........WH coverage of the killing of a very bad man has been referenced and never challanged by anyone.
Not discussing politics.....speaking to NEWS coverage or lack there of which is the absolute subject here.
I cannot imagine discussing news coverage without speaking to phoney and false broadcasts.