
12-07-2019, 08:52 AM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: South of 466a, if you don't like me.......I live in Orlando.
Posts: 12,879
Thanks: 1,013
Thanked 11,071 Times in 4,233 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJblue
I think we can agree that the county commissioners were ultimately to blame for the tax increase, but it is not all related to failing to look at 5 year plans. Public officials around the country routinely require businesses to pay for infrastructure improvements as a condition for granting approval for a development. Any county government worth a salt would never have granted the developer the rights to develop the area south of 44 without first getting an agreement from the developer to fund the infrastructure improvements that were required. That would have ultimately placed the cost of these improvements on those who benefit from them - those who are buying in the new areas.
|
No true on so many fronts.
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dewilson58 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|