View Single Post
 
Old 03-23-2020, 12:46 PM
junction29 junction29 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK and Amhesrt Way,in the Village of Gilchirst
Posts: 538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 26 Posts
Default Don’t agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
Not buying it. If this is a "bioweapon", it is the lousiest ever conceived and developed. It has a relatively low mortality rate, a long prodromal period, generally spread person to person, and has a predilection for older people

A bioweapon should hit hard and fast with a high mortality and affect mostly younger people--like those in the military and those that can fight back.
I don’t agree, a hard hitting bio weapon, would result in immediate and catastrophic retaliation, this one is definitely crippling the West’s economies and cause massive social unrest and upheaval, with the only winner apparent at the moment, being the Chinese economy, with the country bragging that their production is almost back to full production. - Whilst I don’t want to appear paranoid, I am highly suspicious that this is far more than an accident by a secretive and oppressive regime, that wouldn’t think twice about sacrificing a few thousand elderly Chinese if it brought them world wide economic domination.