View Single Post
 
Old 03-25-2020, 11:28 AM
TexaninVA's Avatar
TexaninVA TexaninVA is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Largo
Posts: 2,753
Thanks: 428
Thanked 878 Times in 306 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby View Post
No, they're not doing this. The situation in Italy is that IF they have to ration medical supplies and tests and treatment, IF someone needs to not receive necessary help, THEN they need to decide who does, and who doesn't, get the help they need.

The issue then, is who ends up short-shrifted? How do you decide? The logical, practical answer is - people who are most likely to survive - should be the ones who get the priority help. Those who are least likely to survive, should be the ones left out.

This is unfathomable to most people - but when you're in a situation where someone has to die - and you are the one responsible for making the decision - you have to decide what will be the best for humanity.

Thankfully they are NOT in that situation as of yet. They, so far, do NOT have to make those decisions. Let's hope that remains true.
Yes, I agree with those points. Essentially, you're talking about battlefield triage. It's the only realistic option unfortunately if things get to that point. We all kind of know that too deep down ...