Yes, my comments were about the first paper and I did read the paper. I made my comments because while the 80 patient test did not have a control group, they did do the earlier study with a control group (as would typically be done in a scientific study with a statistical analysis). As they explained for the second paper, they were trying to save as many people as possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueash
Bonus points for either reading a study or perhaps a post online. But the information you are presenting here is not the report which is the topic of this thread. Rather the it is the data from an earlier report by the same group. This newer report had no control group and was much larger, without going back I believe it was 80 patients.
|