Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Hydroxychloroquine rated 'most effective therapy' by doctors for coronavirus: Global
View Single Post
 
Old 04-07-2020, 11:08 AM
blueash's Avatar
blueash blueash is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,397
Thanks: 253
Thanked 3,507 Times in 944 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DianeM View Post
It is currently being used to TRY to save lives. It is not necessary for the mild cases but rather for severe cases. Every single news channel has pointed out that the cocktail being used is showing great potential. Potential beats nothing hands-down.

Vents are good for two or three days. Beyond that, the likelihood of getting off the vent is slim to none. That too has been all over the news including the governor of New York (#1 hotspot).

Desperate times make for successful resolutions. If someone in dire straits wants to try this therapy, I applaud their decision and would do the same thing. There is no reward for dying because you’re too stubborn to try.
Lots to unpack here.
Not necessary for mild cases but rather for severe cases

Both reports starting this thread are of doctors using these medications in mild cases. Their reports both claim that using it in mild cases seems to prevent the disease from becoming severe. So your statement that it should only been used in severe cases would seem to be contrary to what these doctors are doing.

Every single news channel has pointed out that the cocktail being used is showing great potential

The news channels have mostly been extremely cautious in their reporting, being careful to differentiate between showing potential and warning viewers that the information is anecdotal and thus there is no proof of efficacy.

Hydroxychloroquine and Covid-19: an explainer - CNN Is a nice balanced presentation.
One network has been far more positive in its presentation and IMO not giving its viewers a balanced approach as it rarely explains the need for better studies. You can watch the linked report earlier in this thread and you will hearing nothing about cautious interpretation of the data.

Vents are good for two or three days

I'm not sure of the point you are making. Vents are good at keeping you alive far longer than 3 days. I have seen no data suggesting that if you are not off the vent in 3 days that this is a critical point beyond which recovery is nearly impossible. In a study published yesterday from Italy, the average time in ICU of those who were discharged alive was 8 days.

"If someone in dire straits wants to try this therapy, I applaud their decision and would do the same thing"

I agree with that. I might opt for remdesivir if I could get it.
__________________
Men plug the dikes of their most needed beliefs with whatever mud they can find. - Clifford Geertz

Last edited by blueash; 04-26-2020 at 12:12 PM.