Quote:
Originally Posted by Kgcetm
I agree with you. When the governors decide to "take charge" we're going to get too many opening dates and an increase in infections related to travel. I don't understand how New York, California, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana and Kentucky announced they will work toward reopening their states when their states continue to struggle with the basic issues of increasing infections, few hospital beds, exhausted care givers and insufficient supplies. While that's a good number of governors, I think all 50 need to agree on when and what the reopening of America is going to look like. I don't want to become infected because the governor of Michigan thinks it's safe to reopen and they are not. Certainly travel beyond your geographic are should be limited.
|
We have to start getting back to some state of normalcy. From what I read and heard, I believe there are parameters to be reached before a state can reopen. I also think I heard that states can open by county based on cases.
I see no need for all 50 governors to have to agree at the same time for reopening. Montana has more horses than people with very very little infections so they should open if they wish. New York is getting better but is certainly not ready for opening. Each individual governor knows their state so we have to hope they know what they’re doing.