Quote:
Originally Posted by TexaninVA
This may help you a bit.
"With my colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus," explains Luc Montagnier, interviewed by Dr Jean-François Lemoine for the daily podcast at Pourquoi Docteur, adding that others have already explored this avenue:
"In order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory," he added."
Nobel winning scientist who co-discovered HIV claims novel Coronavirus was made in Wuhan's lab
The headline of this link says "Nobel winning scientist who co-discovered HIV claims novel Coronavirus was made in Wuhan's lab" and it's dated 4/18/2020.
Its humorous, and sad, to see the media still trying to peddle the notion of a "conspiracy theory" to discredit what's essentially been factually established. I've already explained what the "conspiracy theory" argument means in practice, so won't repeat it. |
Round and round we go. Another article, same site, same day refutes his claim:
" Novel Coronavirus genome sequence finally reveals the origin - natural, not bio-weapon
Scientists analysed the genome sequence of the new Coronavirus
No human error or leak from any lab"
Novel Coronavirus genome sequence finally reveals the origin - natural, not bio-weapon
There are even
two dissenting opinions within the article you linked to. I guess it comes down to which experts you want to believe.
I've also given my interpretation of what the term "conspiracy theory" means; no need to go there again either.
Lastly, I'm afraid I still don't see how it's "essentially been factually established" when there are
at least as many experts that have said & continue to say that it was a naturally occurring virus.