Quote:
Originally Posted by tvbound
It's not a "theory," it's a fact.
40,000 people came from china even after the constantly touted - "life-saving China ban."
Trying to obfuscate this fact, by bringing up cases coming into New York (which did not have a ban) is simply a red herring - regarding what I posted.
|
So you favor building the wall and putting a halt to the 400,000 Chinese students studying here in order to save lives until a cure is found or the global population has either sufficient herd immunity or has received an effective vaccine?
A total travel ban to the US is nearly impossible to enact because some of those 40,000 who “came from China” may have been married to US citizens, or may have been students in the US, or may have even been US citizens themselves who were traveling back from China. For the US a travel ‘ban’ is really a restriction not total elimination. It would be unConstitutional for the President to ban US citizens from returning home, for instance.
So are you saying that the travel ban was not, in fact, life saving? If so, that is implausible. Or do you simply dislike giving credit for saving lives to President Trump? It is both logical and probable that lives were saved because fatal transmissions were stopped by President Trump disallowing the contagious hosts to travel here, whether you like it or not.