1. With respect, please allow an explanation of the difference ??
A request for a absentee ballot shows a need, mass mailout goes to every registered voter but could end up in the wrong address.
2. Since since there was mail voting, no fraud has happened, although accusation have been leveled with never any substance, so what is the basis for rejecting a method to allow more Americans to vote ?
Your statement that no fraud has happened is simply wrong.
3. Back before Twitter, Facebook, etc., there was no system for mail in voting. Now we are told Facebook and Twitter are vital.....why label mail in voting as a bad thing ?
What does mail in voting have to do with Twitter or Facebook
4. Why is more participation in our system a bad thing?
More participation is not a bad thing if it is done correctly.
5. Why, since the established commission to investigate improper voting was disbanded after 5 months, and the claim of millions of immigrants has been proven to. Be totally false, are we still looking in the haystack ?
Properly done, mail in can be OK , but simply changing rules and mailing out ballots without a well planned system will lead to problems. Think of the possibilities. A ballot is mailed to a dead person. What happens to it? A ballot is mailed to the wrong address. What happens to it? The possibilities are endless.
In summary , more is not better if it is controlled.
|