Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdNoMore
The highlighted portion in your post above (if it's "all over" the internet, it must be true) made me laugh out loud...so thanx for that. 
|
Most of the news we see these days are from the internet. The sources I cited were extremely credible which is why you try to dismiss it with a lame attempt at humor. People read your posts on the internet. Does that mean your opinions have no credibility?
You had to respond in this fashion because you could not refute or debunk any story I listed as they were credible and non partisan websites.
But here is another one that just happened recently. You are going to have to use the internet to read it. It is ironclad proof of how elections can be corrupted with mail in ballots.
And the aggrieved are overwhelmingly in the class of people that you claim to be the guardian over.
NJ NAACP Leader Calls For Paterson Mail-In Vote to Be Canceled Amid Corruption Claims – NBC New York
Paterson activist Ernest Rucker said his experience this election is an example of the kind of corruption that allegedly took place. Rucker said he never received a ballot but that election records show someone mailed in a ballot in his name.
In addition to apparent problems with the vote count in Paterson, NBC New York has shown video of ballots left out in building lobbies, of one voter handling many ballots, and reported on postal workers reporting finding hundreds of ballots at a time stuffed in mailboxes in Paterson – and even in a neighboring town, Haledon.
Wimberly said he is a supporter of Gov. Murphy but given the history of vote-by-mail controversies, the governor should have done more to allow in-person voting and to ensure safeguards were in place for those ballots sent by mail. That one in five ballots were eliminated, some due to alleged corruption, Wimberly said he was "fed up with this … That’s how you disenfranchise voters. That’s the bottom line.
“It is what is right for the people,” Wimberly said. “We need in-person voting machines with social distancing.
If you desire vote by mail elections free of fraud and incompetence, the solution is simple. Since signature verification is very unreliable everyone sets up a pin or password that has to be on the ballot. And it needs to be verified by at least two monitors from different political parties before the ballot it is counted. And then voters can go online and see if their vote was counted or invalidated. We have the technology to do this. And outlaw ballot harvesting with only immediate relatives or legal guardians able to assist in voting.
I would support this as it would be much cheaper and eliminate the need for recruiting volunteers for the polls.