Quote:
Originally Posted by jacksonbrown
And that is just what is wrong with the post baby boomer generations.
When reading an article, or listening to a speaker, once they sense "anything" that doesn't jive with their opinions then they reject the entire hypothesis.
That's termed "narrow-mindedness".
|
I'm not a "post baby boomer," first of all. I'm a babyboomer. Second, I didn't "sense" anything. I fact-checked. I heard her make statements I hadn't read about or heard from the actual news media - not op-ed, but news. The networks, AP, Reuter's, BBC, etc. That was the first thing that I heard her say that I hadn't heard before. So I fact-checked it. I found the articles that made these claims, and fact-checked those claims further. I searched the JAMA and healthnet, and the government's health and science websites, to learn about "what dosage of these substances can cause mental impairment."
Did you do ANY of that, or did you just believe every word because it fit your narrative? Because - THAT would be "narrow-mindedness."