Quote:
Originally Posted by skarra
Phones with video cameras, along with GoPros and body cams have been fabulous at exposing peoples bad behaviors. No longer do we have to just take someones word about how an event went down. These are wonderful times in that respect.
I’ve been looking at some of the videos of bad policing -
OFFICERS SUED FOR SEARCHING VEHICLE DURING TRAFFIC STOP - YouTube is a great example of what bad policing looks like (it also explains why many people are so mistrusting of the police). They score all parties at the end of the video, police and public, and got me thinking why they couldn’t do that as part of an annual review process for individual police officers in general - namely review the captured videos over the year and rate their overall conduct. Then, just like in corporate America, bad performers who score an F could be weeded out by being put on a performance improvement plan. If they don't improve in the next 3-6 months they should be fired.
The main challenge I see is the tendency for some departments to protect their own, so I would suggest the ratings be performed by a separate team. The other problem are the police unions that get involved in protecting the bad apples (it may be that their time has come and gone too). But it would be great for the many good cops whose reputations are tarnished by the incompetent cops who do no-one any good, especially the public. And it would help repair the damage that the recent exposure of bad behavior has done. Only then will the community trust the police again. |
So job evaluations should be performed by NON-law enforcement individuals, that know nothing of police work? Untrained civilians should police the police? I can see how some that are ignorant of the difficult job that law enforcement performs could decide that Social Services is better equipped to handle the job of law enforcement. If not so sad, this would warrant a giant fit of laughter.
News flask: Bad behavior by the police is quickly weeded out. Every heard of Internal Affairs. They are hardly protecting "bad" police officers, even though they are supposedly their own.