Forgetting whether the Commissioner's were/are pawns of the Developer I did the homework necessary to determine in my opinion if they were qualified for these positions. To make this determination I pulled all of the public information I could on each one of the Commissioners and based on this research I came away with the opinion that only 1 "may" have the background to hold an important role as a Commissioner. It is important to not even have the slightest appearance of a conflict of interest to serve the residence and in these cases the appearance of a conflict of interest is over the top. I will give one rather simple test and that is there should never be a "surprise" when Managing! and the fact that reserve funds were not made available over the years for repairs and instead they (the Commissioner's) allowed this to go unattended over the years and surprised the residents would in itself be a cause to let them go. Then to try to fool the residents further by saying "oops" maybe we overstated the need and will reduce the new 25% surprise is just another indication that you can't do the job or you are further extending your errors by trying anything to get reelected. It is a truly a strong indication the current Commissioner's are not the ones to make decisions for the residents.
