Quote:
Originally Posted by jojo
I also have a neighbor with the highest integrity who was elected and agree with your response. He is not anti-developer but will not be bought. He does not have an agenda other than serving the people.
|
I third this statement! I am friends with one of them, as well. And, he is not anti-developer. He just wants honesty and integrity. Something that was CLEARLY lacking with these folks.
I love TV, and all that is has to offer. I am grateful for what Morse and Schwartz did, and look forward to the future here. I am not against them making money(as much as possible), and capitalism itself. I would, if I could. But, IMO, the impact fees associated with the expansion and build-out should be paid by the developer, not the tax payers. And, the developer should try to recoup those expenses, by pricing that into the sale of the homes. That's how it works everywhere else that I know of, and it should here. This is the first place that I've seen where you have a mortgage, and then assume a bond, for the build(which occurred years before)? Just my opinion. Thanks!