Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl
Bill. Maybe in U.K. there is redress for something like this but I think this gentleman would be wasting his money on a lawyer. ( This is the first time I have ever disagreed with you Bill)
The Developer's have used very skilled lawyers to cover things like this.... and they aren't novices. It isn't that I don't feel sorry for him and probably the folks who are changing the direction of the water are wishing they didn't have to build a new cart path. I guess I pretty much think that the builders do very little wrong, but sometimes water has to be redirected. I feel sorry for this fellow. Wonder what the water issue is on Evans Prairie where they are planning to change the path of the golf cart path????
Anybody play a hole that is soggy???? Come to think of it, I think Henry said he did. I will ask him when he returns. He knows every Championship Course here like the back of his hand.
|
I have no idea what the law in UK is regarding this matter, anymore than how the law works in the USA.
But.
If I had paid, as stated by the OP. $100,000 more for a facility, and a few years after purchase someone was going to take that facility away, I would be outside the door of someone who specialises in such matters, first thing the following morning.
I am sure the developers lawyers crossed all the T's and dotted the I's, but if selling something and then taking it away is fine, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark!"
The guy did not buy under a flightpath, and then start complaining about the noise!