I’m hoping someone on here might be able to help me understand something I noticed. I looked at the Exhibit A map on the Revised Master Plan for North of 466. I see where they added the “Multi-Family Residential” for the definition of Mixed Use, but it is also uses that text in the definition of Residential: “Residential may include: Single-Family Residential, Multi-Family Residential”.
Is that a modified definition or has it always been the case and had already included the "Multi-Family Residential" portion? I didn't see anything in the text call out a change of the definition for all the "Residential" areas only to the "Mixed Use" definition? Is that deliberate or an oversight? Either way if approved as written, using one of the new calculations provided in Exhibit 3: Revised Land Use Conversion table, especially of the ".571 single-family units converts to 1 multi-family units" could make things interesting, not quite a duplex but close!
Looks like most folks are focused on the immediate impact of the HH area but doesn't this open the door for request of rezoning to Multi-Family in the future of any of the residential properties on the map?
I sooo hope I'm wrong...
|