Quote:
Originally Posted by Windguy
Did you not get the point that this is taking away something from people? They want to frequent restaurants, but this will prevent them from doing so. It’s similar to the state deciding it’s OK to smoke in restaurants. The way things were with the reduced occupancy, no one was being excluded. Have you ever been denied entry to a restaurant? With 100% occupancy, many people with complicating issues will be unable to eat out. And all you have is a flip answer to their concerns. Nice...
|
Have you considered how many restaurants have closed because they can't financially survive with limited capacity? Have you considered how many employees would lose their income while you still get yours each month? How many families with their children will go hungry and without medical care or perhaps lose their home due to not being able to pay the rent or house payment? How about all the vendors who supply these restaurants with products and the vendors employees and families? What about all the lost income to the cities and government due to reduced taxes and fees that support many programs to help deal with the fallout from the pandemic. All this just so you can be at ease eating out. Really, man up and protect your self before you leave the house or just order in through the various organizations that will bring it to your doorstep and let the rest of us deal with this our own way.