You should reread your own post. I will quote part of it below:
It seems unfair to those Villages residents who have the intelligence to wear masks, and the thoughtfulness not to be potential Covid spreaders, that they have to avoid the squares because management won't make masks mandatory.
This is really comical. You are asserting that people have to avoid the squares because mask are not mandatory. You clearly see things only in absolute terms as opposed to the way that science shows us how nature operates. There is a probability of contracting the virus at the squares with or without mandatory masks and nobody knows how much they differ by. Apparently you believe mandatory masks would make the squares safe - there isn't any science to support this. Generally, the guidance issued by the states comes down to recommending wearing a mask outdoors when you are not able to maintain 6 feet of social distancing. Even the most hard hit state, New York, does not require mandatory masks outside unless social distancing cannot be maintained. In other words, if this was New York, masks would not be mandatory. You might want to do some research before spouting off about our Governor, The Villages, and the White House because most of the country is doing the same thing as The Villages (recommending masks).
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8notes
I'm getting a laugh out of the condescending mansplaining.. You are not an expert, although, judging by the number of virus related posts you've made, you seem to think so. The experts, the scientists do say that wearing masks makes you safer and that masks, combined with social distancing, make one safer yet. And that being outdoors makes you even more safe. Nothing is 100% nor was that ever stated. In any event, nothing is going to change. The Villages is going along with the governor who is clearly backing the white house. So be it.
|