[jimjamuser]

Originally Posted by Snowprint

Since when has the Washington Post been a “questionable source”? The answer is NEVER! The only folks who always rail against it & the New York Times are purveyors of lies that always call facts “fake news”. The most prominent is Fox News who hungrily promote Russian disinformation and praise congenital liars. It’s clear, without any doubt, that Sturgis WAS a super spreader event just like the Amy Comey Barrett introduction at the White House. Anyone who disputes that is either lying or an idiot. It doesn’t matter if you’re wealthy either. You can still be a moron with a lot of money. Stop attacking the messenger! It’s an ad hominem argument that is only used by those who can’t dispute the truth, so they resort to talking about anything but the issue. The Post, along with the New York Times, is a blazing lighthouse in the thickest fog seen since the days of the Nixon administration. We also had the same kind of liars then. Remember Spiro Agnew’s constant attacks on the “media”? He was a stone cold criminal and, I believe, we have a much more brazen mob of criminals now. The big difference is that this group of criminals has a news outlet, Fox News, that embraces lying to Americans.
I notice a lot of posts on this site that rail against the “media” instead of presenting a cogent rebuttal. That’s what Fox News does! Fox News scrambles your brain to the point that you are no longer able to even think. Arguing that Sturgis was NOT a super spreader event is not only wrong, it’s ludicrous.

Exactly correct. The US is awash in propaganda. Social media increases the fog. It takes work to pull out the truth. Truth like the Sturgis Rally aftermath gets obscured.