[jimjamuser]

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby

He's talking about mail-in voting, which requires you to not even be physically capable of presenting your ID to anyone. But it does require that your signature be on file (usually via your Florida drivers' license, which is now also a valid Federal ID, or in person registration to vote), so that the signatures can be matched when you sign the back of the envelope before mailing it in.

Considering that mail-in voting, *regardless of the reason for the mail-in, whether absentee or not* has existed since the Civil War, and considering that mail fraud has been negligible since, and considering that even when it IS discovered, it invalidates the fraudulent votes - thus making the actual votes valid and countable..

considering all that, mail-in ballots is not, nor has it ever been, a concern in this country.

In person voting HAS been a problem, particularly in Georgia and Florida, when a certain party did some certain things creating certain problems, and the subsequent attempts at covering it up were exposed.

So if it were me, I'd be more concerned about a certain party's attempts to subvert and corrupt the voting process at the polling places, and less concerned about mail-in voting.

I'm not all that concerned about either. The person I didn't want, took the Florida election fair and square. I don't like it, but I accept it. Hopefully, the people on that side will have the same attitude if their person doesn't win the final national result. Somehow though, considering THEIR history - I don't have much faith in that.

Good post. in the recent election, There were more than 150,000 ballots (and that may go up to 300,00) blocked (on purpose?) in Post Office facilities and NOT delivered by election day and therefore considered INVALID. Many were suspiciously found in battleground states. This should have been predicted and prevented when PO delivery statistics and procedures were changed in months leading up to Nov. 3rd. Where were the crack FBI investigators who are charged with preventing this type of crime? Where is the public outrage? Where are the criminal charges for leadership in the PO? A charge of TREASON would be fitting.