Some big assumptions being made in these posts.
The OP took exception to his appearance but no one else seems to have noticed so could it have been that out of the ordinary?
Were the fingernails truly long or just longer than the OP was accustomed to? The OP didn't mention any dirt under the nails, only the length and what could have been under them. So again, were they long and dirty or just not what the OP was accustomed to?
If the long (too long for a man?) hair was held back by clips (sparkly or otherwise) then is there a different standard for men's and women's hair? It probably met the requirements of both the health code and the restaurant.
Where was it stated that the server's appearance did not meet the dress code of the establishment?
And some of the other ____ist and ___phobic comments in these replies say more about the person who chose to post them than they do about the server.
|