
11-23-2020, 01:05 PM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 7,704
Thanks: 3,598
Thanked 11,245 Times in 3,571 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
In general, I don't believe in bailing out people who make bad decisions. However, in this case, there are a few things to consider. It's usually in the developer's best interest to make the residents happy, it's good PR and in the long run might help sell more houses. Better to have happy residents bragging about what TV did for their noise problem than having them run and complain to the Orlando newspaper and television stations, who are not very sympathetic to TV to start with. Furthermore, the developer had to be very aware of the (potential) noise problem and sold the homes anyway. The best time for noise abatement would have been when building. Did these home sell at a "discount" because of noise? I don't know, but if they did I'm less sympathetic to the homeowners, who were in that case essentially paid to live with traffic noise.
|
Didn't that all go out the window with the Hacienda Hills fiasco?
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tophcfa For This Useful Post:
|
|
|