Actually the purpose of MCAS was to provide essentially the same performance characteristics as the previous generation of 737s so that training could be minimized. The MAX, because of the new engine location, would tend to fly at a higher angle of attack than previous generations under some circumstances. This does not impact the airworthiness of the plane. If the plane had airworthiness issues associated with the engine placement it would not have received the new certification. The problem was with the design of the MCAS system itself and Boeing’s desire to eliminate training as a sales impediment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanFL
.
.
again - the CORE design flaw is not 'corrected', simply masked with a corrective system, MCAS.
I'm done with the back<>forth.
Bottom line for me - I love new aircraft/aerospace development. And to fly, although so limited recently of course. Sincerely hope that Boeing can restore its luster and reputation - a LOT depends upon that. And that the airlines and public build faith with the restored MAX. If not, Airbus will continue to take more market share, and who knows what China may do?
Would I fly on it? yes.
.
.
|