Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspinmo
IMO I don’t have problems with developers redoing building they own and already built. If they are empty it’s none of my business what developers Does with it.
IMO what I do have problem with when developers tear down buildings and put 100s of apartments in district they sold the amenities to district and the area was already built out years ago. Now developers are over crowding an over crowded area. IMO fighting the wrong battle around square.
IMO the developers can do what they want in the new built areas, but should be rained In when they try to over develop districts they long ago sold amenities to districts 1 through 13 And built out residentially.
Notice I said MY OPINION.  |
I really don't have any dog in this fight but I agree that the Developer owns the buildings and can do with them what he wants. The golf cart and parking issues are so overblown...I have never had a problem parking in Spanish Springs with either the car or cart....I suspect the complaint is the closeness to destination that most object to. The more population you can bring downtown the more businesses will benefit and if you notice, none of them have objected to what the Developer is planning. The more business sees benefit, the more the residents will benefit. While I also believe the other planned apartments will also be beneficial to the community, because of its location I will let the residents choose their fate on that one.