[Bucco]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

"Trash" might be harsh but it would be hard to argue that the presentation is unbiased.

The former Federal and State Prosecutor uses the video to make his points. He generated the video, he knows what is in it, yet he puts words into the mouth of the store owner that are not present on his video.

The video is edited to cut out several minutes between approaching the car and sitting Floyd on the sidewalk. The video is also edited to cut about six minutes of time the officer spent kneeling on Floyd's neck. Perhaps it was only edited to remove periods of time where nothing was happening but it was edited.

If the officer is being accused of kneeling on the neck for an unnecessarily long period of time then editing the video to reduce that amount of time seems suspicious.

To clarify MY use of the word "trash"....

I use it to describe...

.....Sending of false information and purporting it to be accurate

.....disseminating disinformation on any subject.

It speaks directly to the author and his/her dishonesty and lack of respect for any reader.

When you see a video on YOUTUBE, you must consider its source........that channel is used daily to present DISINFORMATION, which some weak people will believe.